William Albert Burge was born on the 18th
February 1861 at Westminster in London. His birth certificate said that
his parents were William Burge, carpenter, and Mary Burge nee Greenway,
both born Westminster. Seemingly straightforward... except that this just
doesn't make sense!
You see, my great great grandparents were
William Burge and Mary nee Greenway... and they weren't born in Westminster,
and it was unlikely they'd be having another child at the age they were.
William would have been 56 and Mary 48 - rather old, especially in the
19th century, to be having a baby. Not totally impossible, but improbable
... and if they had, why would he have been born in London, when they lived
90 miles away in Batheaston? My GG grandparents already had a son named
William who was still alive in 1861, so why would they have named another
son William? These questions were to puzzle me for a number of years -
because it was obvious to me that this William Albert was one of my family....
.
.
As well as his parent's names, his children's
names had given me my first major clue that he was 'one of mine'... they
were as follows:
Mary Polly Burge, born April 1884 in
Cheddar, Somerset, England; died 3 July 1964 in Mesopotamia, Ohio*
William Burge, born 8 June 1886 Cheddar,
Somerset, England; died March
1967 in Trumbull County, Ohio*
Ellen Nell Burge, born December 1889
Collumpton, England; died June 9 1956*
George Reginald Burge, born 23 April
1892 Cheddar, County of Somerset,
England; died 23 July 1980 Mineral Ridge,
Mahoning County, Ohio.
Rhoda Sarah Burge, born 1896 Cheddar,
Somerset, England; died September
1957 Braceville, Trumbull County, Ohio*
John Gulley Burge, born 3 December
1897 in Cheddar, Somerset, England, died 1984 Mesopotamia, Trumbull County,
Ohio*
Thomas Greenway Burge, born 03 December
1897 in Cheddar, England; died 20 May 1981 Chardon, Ohio*
* NOTE: All information from Lynette
Burge's now non-existent web page, except that she had John 'Gulliver'
- later found to be incorrect (and I thought it likely was at the time).
There are a few other details incorrect - Mary was baptised in Batheaston
on 17 Aug 1884, so it is likely she was also born there. I believe
that it was also 'Reginald George' - not the other way round. 'Polly' and'Nell'
were probably nicknames.
Lynette Burge's web page had William Albert
marrying Emily Ann Pritchard 01 December 1883 in Widcombe, County of Somerset,
District of Bath. The couple had their seven children in England, then
emigrated to the US and settled in Ohio.
If you see this Lynette, please get in touch!
The similarities between William Albert's
family and mine were as follows:
My GG grandparents were William Burge,
carpenter, and Mary Nee Greenway. William Albert's parents were William
Burge, carpenter and Mary Nee Greenway.
My GG grandparents and William Albert both
had sons named Thomas Greenway Burge and John Gulley Burge. My GG
grandparents gave these family names as middle names to their two sons
from William's mother and Mary's maiden names. I have found them nowhere
else in this combination - other than in my direct family line. My very
first search on Google for my great grandfather Thomas Greenway Burge came
up with William Albert's son instead!
My gg grandparents were Mary and
William, William Albert's first two children's names were Mary and
William.
Both my GG grandparents and William Albert
had other children named William, Ellen, Sarah, Mary and Rhoda.
The research by Lynette Burge had William
Albert, born 1861, as raised by his grandparents and apprenticed
as a shoemaker. In the 1881 census, my GG grandmother Mary was where
she was supposed to be in Batheaston. With her was William Burge, born
1861,
living with his grandmother, occupation listed as shoemaker.
At that time, the 1881 was the only census I had access to.
Lynette Burge's research also had William
Albert's father-in-law as keeping the White Lion Inn at Batheaston.
My family came from Batheaston.
How could William Albert Burge of Mesopotamia
NOT be one of my family? But it still didn't fit.
I didn't believe he was one of my GG grandparents'
sons as was indicated by his birth certificate - he had to have been a
grandson. I played with a few theories of whose child he may have
been, but none of them panned out.
I put all this 'coincidence' on my web page,
and attempted to contact the US Burge's unsuccessfully for a number of
years. I was then fortunate enough to have a descendant of William Albert's,
a lovely lady named Tami, read my web page... asking the same questions
I'd been asking for so long! She emailed me, and we slowly pieced together
the story... a family secret that had been kept for almost 150 years.
.
.
The 1881 census had William Albert as:
Mary BURGE Head M Female
63 Batheaston, Somerset, England, Dressmaker
Rhoda BURGE Daur U Female
27 Batheaston, Somerset, England
William BURGE Grandson U
Male 20 Batheaston, Somerset, England, Shoe Maker
Note, he was listed as 'born in Batheaston',
this was always part of my confusion with him. There was no record of his
birth in Batheaston.
In 1871, he was listed as living alone with
Mary:
Mary Burge, Head, 57, Dressmaker.
William, Son, 10, Scholar,
Note that in this earlier time he was listed
as Mary's 'son', in 1881 he was listed as her 'grandson'.
Then though, came the truly definitive and
secret-busting piece of information! In the 1861 census he was listed as
living at the same address given on his birth certificate in London as
follows:
BARGE, Mary, Head, Widow, F, 46, Dressmaker,
Somerset
TAYLOR, Ellen Elizabeth, Daughter, Married,
F, 20, Dressmaker, Somerset
TAYLOR, William Albert, Grandson, M, 0,
Westminster St John
This was the point where my 'cousin' Tami
(who'd found this gem) said she could hardly type for the excitement! He
WAS born in Westminster... and even though his name and that of his mother
were given as 'Taylor' (a play on words for them both being dressmakers
perhaps?) the name Taylor was never mentioned in any records again... and
there's no record of Ellen ever marrying the elusive MISTER Taylor! We
had, however, worked out at long last what the exact tie between William
Albert and the Burge family was. The ancestor of this branch of the US
Burge family was Ellen Elizabeth Burge.
The address was 5 Stafford Place, St John,
Westminster... and this led to yet another twist in the secret tale
of William Albert!
.
There had been an old family rumour that William
Albert was a 'royal bastard'. This was only found out by Tami when she
asked older family members for his history. She and I dismissed this as
pretty unlikely at the time :-)
THEN I looked up Stafford Place, Westminster,
where Ellen, Mary and baby William Albert were living after his birth.
It is just outside the walls of Buckingham Palace! It would be no more
than a five minute walk.
The early 1860's were also the time when the
young Prince of Wales, Albert Edward (nicknamed Bertie, later King Edward
VII of England), was beginning an unofficial career of wenching. His mother,
Queen Victoria, was furious with him for this. She blamed him for the death
of his father - who had travelled to see a young woman in 1861 who was
reputedly pregnant with Bertie's bastard - and caught a chill he never
recovered from. Bertie became famous for his many mistresses in later years.
Just as an absolute aside... Camilla Parker-Bowles'
great grandmother was one of his mistresses!
It is no great stretch of the imagination
for young Bertie to have had another bastard the same year - to a servant.
All the Burge girls were very pretty; young William's birth name included
'Albert' but this name wasn't used on any of the later censuses; there
was quite a cover-up of his birth; and yes - there IS a physical resemblance
between William Albert and King Edward! Pictures of the two for comparison
may be seen here, as well
as a map showing the short distance from Stafford Place to Buckingham Palace.
The simple fact there's a family rumour that
said so is another reason to give this theory some credence. How many families
include a rumour like that in their history? All the same, this is certainly
not being taken as a totally serious piece of factual information by the
family - although there's been talk of DNA testing... I have since been
contacted by another descendant of William Albert, quite unconnected to
Tami, who also 'knew' from family oral history that she was descended from
a 'royal bastard'. This serves to make it even more likely.
I LOVE this story!!! Even if he WASN'T a royal
bastard, the detective work required to track down who his MOTHER was was
a huge effort, and I took great pleasure in watching it unfold - and I
congratulate Tami soundly for finding out! It is the biggest genealogical
'scoop' in my family so far. If DNA testing should ever prove the famous
ancestor, I'll let you all know right here :-)
.
Ellen was again confirmed as being William Albert's
mother when he was baptised, the record from the Batheaston Parish Register
states:
29 April 1875, William Albert son of Ellen
Burge. He's listed as age 14 when he was baptised. Ellen is listed as living
in London employed as a Servant.
Ellen Elizabeth Burge married
William Edmund Harris in 1864, had eight more children, and died in 1889.
Note that she had married before the above baptism, but was still named
as 'Burge'. Full details of her later family may be found here.
If you're a descendant of William Albert or
Ellen Elizabeth and would like to email me with questions I can refer you
on to others in the US line of his family. If you have any new information
to offer, please email me!!!
If anyone has knowledge of houses in Stafford
Place and nearby areas being owned by the Royal Family, please email me
as well! I've had a very similar family history relayed to me, with another
young woman having an illegitimate child at about the same time. The boy
was later raised to a rather high position, considering his birth - and
they also lived in Stafford Place :-)
.
.
William
Albert and Albert Edward
Back: William
and Mary Burge
Back: Burge Family
History Index
Guestbook
Email
(Background image is from
an early postcard of Buckingham Palace)
|